Showing posts with label study suggests. Show all posts
Showing posts with label study suggests. Show all posts

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Expert Suggests Skipping Pelvis When Scanning for Clots Technique would cut radiation exposure but not harm diagnosis, study suggests

Expert Suggests Skipping Pelvis When Scanning for Clots
Technique would cut radiation exposure but not harm diagnosis, study suggests


By Robert Preidt

TUESDAY, May 3 (HealthDay News) -- A new study suggests that eliminating the pelvis from areas of the lower body that are scanned when looking for blood clots would not lessen the effectiveness of the test but would significantly reduce the exposure to radiation.

The imaging test, called CT venography, checks for a venous thromboembolism, or a blood clot in the veins. Such clots usually form in the legs. It's critical to locate and treat any clots before they can migrate to the lungs, where they can be life-threatening.

But it does not truly aid the diagnosis to include the pelvis in the scanning, according to the researchers, who were to present their findings Tuesday in Chicago at the annual meeting of the American Roentgen Ray Society.

The study involved an analysis of data on 1,527 people who were examined for venous thromboembolism at the Nassau University Medical Center in East Meadow, N.Y., during a three-year period. In those exams, just five people -- 0.3 percent -- were found to have isolated pelvic VTE, according to the study.

Dr. Charbel Ishak, the study's lead author, said that the finding should help radiologists implement new protocols for pelvic examinations that would reduce patients' exposure to radiation.

"Radiologists and technologists can eliminate pelvic imaging while acquiring only images of the lower extremities with CT venography, starting from groin to below the knee," he said in a news release from the society. "We believe that by stopping the imaging of the pelvis, we can decrease patient radiation dose without significantly affecting the diagnosis of VTE."

Experts note that research presented at a meeting should be considered preliminary because it has not been subjected to the rigorous scrutiny given to research published in medical journals.

SOURCE: American Roentgen Ray Society, news release, May 3, 2011

Technique would cut radiation exposure but not harm diagnosis, study suggests

Expert Suggests Skipping Pelvis When Scanning for Clots
Technique would cut radiation exposure but not harm diagnosis, study suggests

By Robert Preidt


TUESDAY, May 3 (HealthDay News) -- A new study suggests that eliminating the pelvis from areas of the lower body that are scanned when looking for blood clots would not lessen the effectiveness of the test but would significantly reduce the exposure to radiation.

The imaging test, called CT venography, checks for a venous thromboembolism, or a blood clot in the veins. Such clots usually form in the legs. It's critical to locate and treat any clots before they can migrate to the lungs, where they can be life-threatening.

But it does not truly aid the diagnosis to include the pelvis in the scanning, according to the researchers, who were to present their findings Tuesday in Chicago at the annual meeting of the American Roentgen Ray Society.

The study involved an analysis of data on 1,527 people who were examined for venous thromboembolism at the Nassau University Medical Center in East Meadow, N.Y., during a three-year period. In those exams, just five people -- 0.3 percent -- were found to have isolated pelvic VTE, according to the study.

Dr. Charbel Ishak, the study's lead author, said that the finding should help radiologists implement new protocols for pelvic examinations that would reduce patients' exposure to radiation.

"Radiologists and technologists can eliminate pelvic imaging while acquiring only images of the lower extremities with CT venography, starting from groin to below the knee," he said in a news release from the society. "We believe that by stopping the imaging of the pelvis, we can decrease patient radiation dose without significantly affecting the diagnosis of VTE."

Experts note that research presented at a meeting should be considered preliminary because it has not been subjected to the rigorous scrutiny given to research published in medical journals.

SOURCE: American Roentgen Ray Society, news release,2012

Pet Dogs May Be Exposed to High Levels of Flame Retardants PBDEs higher in canine blood than humans; food processing may play role, study suggests

Pet Dogs May Be Exposed to High Levels of Flame Retardants
PBDEs higher in canine blood than humans; food processing may play role, study suggests


By Robert Preidt


(Healthlinne News) -- Levels of chemical flame-retardants in the blood of pet dogs are five to 10 times higher than in humans, researchers have found.

In the study, Indiana University scientists checked the levels of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in the blood of 17 pet dogs who mainly lived indoors. The average blood concentration of the chemicals in the dogs was about 2 nanograms per gram.

The researchers also found that PBDE levels in dog food average about 1 nanogram per gram, which is much higher than levels found in meat and poultry sold for human consumption. This suggests that PBDEs in dog food may come from processing rather than from the food sources.

The study was published online April 18 in the journal Environmental Science & Technology.

PBDEs are used as flame-retardants in a wide range of consumer products, including furniture and electronics. The chemicals can migrate out of the products and enter the environment, according to background information in a university news release.

One particularly hazardous type was voluntarily removed from the U.S. market in 2004, but still lingers in the environment, the researchers noted.

"Even though they've been around for quite a while, we don't know too much about these compounds' toxicological effects on humans or animals," study author Marta Venier, an assistant research scientist in the School of Public Health and Environmental Affairs, said in the news release.

The researchers are exploring whether pets could serve as "biosentinels" for monitoring human exposure to chemicals in the home. In a previous study, the investigators found that pet cats had much lower levels of PBDEs than dogs.

Because their metabolism is better equipped to break down chemicals found in homes, dogs may be better biosentinels than cats, the researchers explained.

SOURCE: Indiana University, news release, April 26, 2011
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
2leep.com
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...